justice2kb
       

 

Choice

To expose accounting fraud it is necessary to expose the accounting trails at bk467p191. Judgments made without exposing these trails are judgments made without looking at the evidence. To not expose accounting fraud do not expose bk467p191.

I do not understand why the public is not made aware of the accountant's patterns. Do the powers that be not realize that exposing these trails would show whether testators have entrusted their assets and their family to accountants who are held out to the public as to be trusted, and the accountants use that trust to steal the testator's assets and cover their thefts by using an innocent family member to carry out instructions that destroys the family's unity, and consequently the family's ability to protect itself? That the instructions destroy the testator's family as a family? Is it politically impossible to remove the shroud of secrecy and enforce the rule of law?